Scythe, you're doing nothing but trolling now. Nothing more needs to be said to you or about you. LOL.
goodasgold,
It's actually very difficult to pinpoint someone's exact political positions without them making few substantial posts revealing various related positions. Posts something and then I'd be able to tell you. But don't bother if you're just gonna troll.
However, its not difficult to discern someones cognitive abilities, temperament, and so on from just a few posts.
Look, like I keep saying, lets see what unfolds in the coming weeks.
And when I say I haven't even posted anything interesting yet, I mean things which involve more intricate arguments requiring some real brain power. Truth is I haven't.
Just to let you know: I first learned of Wright, Ayers, and a few other buddies of Bwaak months before he surfaced. Rightwing talkradio had been talking about him for over a year. He was on Fox talking to Hannity over a year ago. At first, I thought all of it was just rightwing GOP smear vis-a-vis the 2004 swiftboating of John Kerry. But when I saw Obama race baiting the Clintons repeatedly starting in early Jan 2008, and the media defending him. I immediately knew something was up. I then started looking into all of the rumors on the bloggosphere on Bwaak. After a few days, I was convinced that Obama was a compromised politician and that the media was picking him to win the nomination. I also predicted that Wright would surface, but at a very late date, too late to affect the nomination process. Along those lines, I'm predicting a lot more will new stuff will surface and the old stuff will resurface (Wright, Trinity, etc.).
Question: Why would Fox sit on the
Wright story until mid March of 2008, when they interviewed him before March of 2007 ?!?
A theory must be able to explain and predict.
Mine does. B)
