News Reports

[Sir_Garland]

I'm probably the only one that's happy by this but yay!!!!

 

[dascoot]

Originally posted by ledzepgrl@Jan 17 2006, 09:52 AM
Wow :blink:

I timed my husband once, he can do it in like 3 minutes 40 seconds, something like that. :blink:

 

[Sir_Garland]

Originally posted by dascoot+Jan 17 2006, 04:14 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (dascoot @ Jan 17 2006, 04:14 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-ledzepgrl@Jan 17 2006, 09:52 AM
Wow :blink:

I timed my husband once, he can do it in like 3 minutes 40 seconds, something like that. :blink: [/b][/quote]
That's how my husband is. I only need like 2 minutes to peel those little stickers off and move them to where each side is alllll one color.

 

[dascoot]

:lol:

He taught me how to get about 75% done, but that last 25% takes way too much mental acuity so I just get bored and wander off to watch Simpsons.

 

[Magilune]

:lol:

 

[ledzepgrl]

Click :lol:

 

[Sir_Garland]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,182083,00.html

 

[cultclassic]

:lol:

 

[cultclassic]

Don't judges have anything better to do?

 

[Sir_Garland]

http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Music/01/1...t.ap/index.html

 

[Bloodlessr]

Speaking of judges, I heard on the tv that there was a judge who gave a guy 9 weeks or some stupid sentence to a guy who raped a child, twice! I was pissed, that guys should get life or at least like 50 years or something. That is the first part of my story, then I heard on tv about some lady who tried to screw over Wendy's or something and she got like 9 years in prison! WTF is going on with our justice system!!!!

 

[Sir_Garland]

Yes the child raper should have definately gotten more!!!! The finger lady deserves it. She won't have to serve all of it anyway. Yes, the juducial system is extremely flawed.

 

[ledzepgrl]

Mother of the Century candidate

 

[a_iver]

That's horrible. :angry:

 

[Sir_Garland]

Wow!! I couldn't even image how this would feel!

 

[cultclassic]

I saw that! I searched for the other guy mentioned in the article and found this:

http://www.innocenceproject.org/case/displ...file.php?id=149


Excerpt:

"mitochondrial DNA testing proved that the pubic hair did not come from Dedge.
....
The State, however, argued that because Dedge had won access to DNA testing too early - before there was a law governing postconviction DNA testing - he could not benefit from the new law, or get into court with new evidence of innocence.

For three years, the State opposed Dedge's motions on procedural grounds, at one time admitting in court that they would oppose Dedge's release even if they knew that he was absolutely innocent."

:blink:

 

[Sir_Garland]

Oh my goodness that's crazy!! I have a friend that now works for a company in Florida that does DNA research for different cases that have been closed or whatever. I guess they go back and research DNA stuff from old cases. I think that would be an awesome job! Especially because you would be helping so many people. If not the innocent that have been convicted, then the family of crime victims looking for justice.

 

[dascoot]

Originally posted by cultclassic@Jan 23 2006, 05:51 PM
I saw that! I searched for the other guy mentioned in the article and found this:

http://www.innocenceproject.org/case/displ...file.php?id=149


Excerpt:

"mitochondrial DNA testing proved that the pubic hair did not come from Dedge.
....
The State, however, argued that because Dedge had won access to DNA testing too early - before there was a law governing postconviction DNA testing - he could not benefit from the new law, or get into court with new evidence of innocence.

For three years, the State opposed Dedge's motions on procedural grounds, at one time admitting in court that they would oppose Dedge's release even if they knew that he was absolutely innocent."

:blink:

Who wants to come live in my new country! :woo:

 

[cultclassic]

Originally posted by dascoot+Jan 23 2006, 06:08 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (dascoot @ Jan 23 2006, 06:08 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-cultclassic@Jan 23 2006, 05:51 PM
I saw that! I searched for the other guy mentioned in the article and found this:

http://www.innocenceproject.org/case/displ...file.php?id=149


Excerpt:

"mitochondrial DNA testing proved that the pubic hair did not come from Dedge.
....
The State, however, argued that because Dedge had won access to DNA testing too early - before there was a law governing postconviction DNA testing - he could not benefit from the new law, or get into court with new evidence of innocence.

For three years, the State opposed Dedge's motions on procedural grounds, at one time admitting in court that they would oppose Dedge's release even if they knew that he was absolutely innocent."

:blink:

Who wants to come live in my new country! :woo: [/b][/quote]
Pick Me! Pick Me!

 

[dascoot]

Oh honey, you're REQUIRED. You and Fitz make up the entire Think Tank. If y'all weren't comin on your own you were comin drugged.